GENETICS - BIOL 97
Homework 4: due 9/10/09
Assignment
4 (10 points): completion by day 6 of class
Genetics is a rapidly growing and changing field. It epitomizes
many scientific fields in that ideas and information are frequently
replaced by new information and interpretations. In order to keep
up, it is important to read the research journals in which scientists
report their research results and their interpretations of their own,
and others' work. These reports are often highly technical, and
by their nature are usually narrow in scope. One can keep abreast
fairly well, although not quite as up-to-date, by reading
"reviews". These are secondary sources. Some are written by
professional journalists or "science writers". Others are written
by the same people who are actively involved in cutting edge
research. Scientific American is a magazine in which well-known
scientists write reviews of their own work, or sometimes broader
reviews of their own fields of study.
The assignment, due day 6 of class, in class, is to peruse the
last year of Scientific American. If some issues are missing, it
is O.K. Look at the most recent 12 issues you can find.
A. Count the number of articles which you think pertain to
genetics. Write down which issues you looked through, and your
total count of related articles. There is no need to
list the articles, though you may if you wish. Just note the
total count.
B. Choose one that seems interesting. Read it. Write [this
should not be more than a page, total]:
1. Brief (approximately one paragraph) summary of the main points
in the article (from the author's point of view). - do not try to go
into detail, just write what the article was about, in your own
words.
2. The one or two points which you found most important, interesting,
intriguing, or new to yourself.
3. At least one issue or question which follows from the work described
i.e. what the next step should be.
4. At least 1 future implication (e.g. medical) of this work.
5. At least 1 ethical implication of this work (or its future
potential as discussed for #4).
6. How the material presented in the article relates to some issue
other than what is specifically mentioned by the author.